Covers architecture and platform decisions for reusable capabilities across implementation styles.
Station
Architecture & Platform Decisions
Use requirements and constraints to select the implementation style, architecture pattern, and enabling platform capabilities.
Architecture choices should follow from evidence about business impact, locations, trust boundaries, capacity, latency, data ownership, consistency, operability, security, privacy, governance, and cost.
Method map
Metro map
Select a cycle, station, or stakeholder to open its permanent method page.
Selected station: Architecture & Platform Decisions
People to involve
Related resources
Outcomes
- A justified architecture choice
- Documented risks, locations, capacity, security, privacy, and operability constraints
- Clear rationale for API, event, file, stream, data product, direct integration, or hybrid implementation style
Journey criteria
Entry criteria
- Capability opportunity is identified and documented.
- The capability addresses a clear business need and is reusable by its intended consumers.
- The selected interface provides an appropriate abstraction for consumers.
- The capability value proposition has been validated with business and consumer stakeholders.
- Consumer segments are identified.
- A high-level implementation roadmap is defined.
Exit criteria
- The capability addresses a clear business need and is reusable by its intended consumers.
- The selected interface provides an appropriate abstraction for consumers.
- The capability value proposition has been validated with business and consumer stakeholders.
- Consumer segments are identified.
- A high-level implementation roadmap is defined.
This is what success looks like
Compare viable architecture styles against the gathered requirements and document the selected pattern and rationale.
- Use the Business Impact Canvas to identify availability, security, and data risks that influence architecture options. — Business Impact Canvas
- Use the Locations Canvas to capture geopolitical, regulatory, network, residency, and trust-boundary constraints. — Location Canvas
- Use the Capacity Canvas to capture current and future volumes, peaks, latency, caching, rate limiting, and scaling expectations. — Capacity Canvas
- Use metrics and analytics guidance to define how the chosen capability will be monitored and improved.
Metro lines
Focuses on solution and interface design principles that can be used across APIs, integrations, automations, data products, and other implementation styles.
Review station resources
Browse the resources selected for Architecture & Platform Decisions; the summary above explains how they support this station’s work.
Station resources
Resources for Architecture & Platform Decisions
canvas
Business Impact Canvas
Identify business, availability, security, data, compliance, and operational risks that should shape architecture and platform decisions.
Outcomes
- Documented business and operational impact assessment
- Prioritized risks and mitigation actions
- Evidence for architecture and platform decisions
How it works
- Availability Risks: Identify risks and impacts.
- Ways to Mitigate Availability Risks: Define mitigation measures.
- Security Risks: Document security-related risks.
- Ways to Mitigate Security Risks: Propose strategies to mitigate security risks.
- Data Risks: Identify risks to data accuracy or availability.
- Ways to Mitigate Data Risks: Plan strategies to address data risks.
Relevant cycles
Capability Productization Cycle
A cycle for turning business capabilities into reusable digital capabilities before selecting the implementation style.
API Productization Cycle
The API-focused APIOps Cycles journey for productizing, designing, delivering, publishing, and improving APIs.
Integration Productization Cycle
A cycle for productizing reusable integration capabilities before selecting the implementation style.
Automation Cycle
A cycle for identifying, designing, delivering, enabling, and improving automation opportunities.